PROHance SAFETY INFORMATION
An added sense of security for your patients
With 14.5 million doses administered worldwide, ProHance has demonstrated consistently low overall rates of
adverse events.1
These events were mild to moderate in severity, and are comparable to other gadolinium-containing MRI contrast
agents as demonstrated in clinical trials.2-7 The most commonly noted adverse experiences were nausea and taste
perversion, with an incidence of 1.4%8.
90% of the dose is excreted within 24 hours post-injection8.
No contraindications for all patients including patients with renal impairment8. Screen patients for acute kidney injury
and other conditions that may reduce renal function, and take this information into account when making treatment decisions.
ProHance does not interfere with serum calcium determinations by
colorimetric methods9-10
This pooled data is derived from the safety data reported in the approved labeling for each respective product. In the
absence of adequate and well-controlled head-to-head investigations, no clinical conclusions or comparisons may be
made among products. Prohance does not interfere with serum calcium determinations by colorimetric methods9-10
Pseudohypocalcemia has been shown to occur following administration of Omniscan and OptiMARK11-13
- In one comparative clinical study, false hypocalcemia was noted in 15.7% of 1,049 examinations performed
with Omniscan9
- In 25 examinations (2.4%), the decreases in serum calcium readings resulted in measurements of “critical”
hypocalcemia, resulting in inappropriate and potentially dangerous therapy in 18 patients9

Adapted from Prince M, et al. Radiology, 2003; 227:644. Used with permission.
FDA NSF Safety Update
REFERENCES: 1. Postmarketing Surveillance and Utilization Report 2010. On file, Bracco Diagnostics Inc. 2. Kirchin MA, Runge VM. Contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: safety update. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;14:426-435. 3. Goldstein HA, Kashanian FK, Blumetti RF, Holyoak WL, Hugo FP, Blumenfield DM. Safety assessment of gadopentetate dimeglumine in U.S. clinical trials. Radiology. 1990;174:17-23. 4. Runge VM, Parker JR. Worldwide clinical safety assessment of gadoteridol injection: an update. Eur Radiol. 1997; 7(suppl 5S):243-245. 5. Sze G, Brant-Zawadzki M, Haughton VM, et al. Multicenter study of gadodiamide injection as a contrast agent in MR imaging of the brain and spine. Radiology. 1991;181:693-699. 6. Kirchin MA, Pirovano G, Venetianer C, Spinazzi A. Safety assessment of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance): Extended clinical experience from phase 1 studies to post-marketing surveillance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:281-294.7. Goldstein HA, Kashanian FK, Blumetti R, et al. Safety assessment of Gd-DPTA in U.S. Clinical Trials. Radiology. 1990; 174:17-23. 8. ProHance (gadoteridol) injection 279.3 mg/mL full Prescribing Information. Princeton, NJ: Bracco Diagnostics Inc.; July 2011. 9. Prince MR, Erel HE, Lent RW, et al. Gadodiamide administration causes spurious hypocalcemia. Radiology. 2003;22:639-646. 10. Emerson J, Kost G. Spurious hypocalcemia after Omniscan-or OptiMARK-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:1151-1156. 11. Normann PT, Froysa A, Svaland M. Interference of gadodiamide injection (OMNISCAN) on the colorimetric determination of serum calcium. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1995;55:421-426. 12. Lin J, Idee JM, Port M, et al. Interference of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents with the serum calcium measurement technique using colorimetric reagents. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1999;21:931-943. 13. Proctor KA, Rao LV, Roberts WL.Gadolinium magnetic resonance contrast agentsproduce analytic interference in multiple serum assays. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;121:282-292.
